Why Infrix — the same deal, two ways

Adjectives don't convince anyone. So here is one ordinary task — a token escrow that releases when the buyer approves — built the usual way and the Infrix way, with the difference you can actually run.

The task

Buyer deposits. Seller marks delivered. Buyer approves release. Funds release to the seller. (examples/compare/escrow.json.)

Side by side

	On Ethereum / a typical chain	On Infrix
How you act	Sign a raw transaction; trust validators to execute it correctly	Submit a governed intent — what you want, in typed terms
What enforces the rules	Whatever the contract author wrote; nothing structurally stops an unguarded path	Policy + approval are enforced by the runtime: no path mutates state without them
Why you believe the result	"Valid because the chain's node says so"	A portable proof you re-verify yourself — offline, against a server you don't trust
How you audit	Trust the RPC/explorer, or re-run an indexer over opaque calldata	Decode one evidence bundle: intent → plan → approval → outcome → evidence → anchor
Who has to be honest	The node you query	No one — the verdict is math you re-run

The escrow logic is the same. What changes is who you have to trust for the result — and on Infrix, the answer is nobody.

See it, then verify it yourself

1. Run it: the live playground runs exactly this escrow as a governed flow and shows every stage building.
2. Verify it — against nobody's word:

npm i @infrix/verify

import { verifyPortablePackage } from '@infrix/verify';
import { createRequire } from 'node:module';
const proof = createRequire(import.meta.url)('@infrix/verify/portable-fixture.valid.json');
const r = await verifyPortablePackage(proof);
console.log(r.passed ? '✅ verified offline — no node trusted' : '❌ failed');

3. Try to break it: the playground's Tamper Lab lets you forge a field and watch verification reject it at the exact broken link. Failing to beat tamper-evidence is the fastest way to trust it.

What Infrix does not claim (so you can trust what it does)

• No TEE claim. Confidentiality is policy + ZK / selective disclosure, not "trust our enclave."
• Honest assurance levels. Anonymous/offline verification caps at L3; L4 means the anchor is confirmed against the live Accumulate ledger — never the Infrix node's word.
• Testnet, not mainnet. The public devnet anchors to the Accumulate Kermit testnet — real anchors, no real funds.

Candor is the point: you don't have to take any of this on faith. Run it. Verify it. Try to forge it.

→ See a real proof on the public ledger · Start building · Try the playground